Style in a film is a very fine issue. On one hand, it always helps to throw in some sparkle to keep the viewer’s attention, plus there’s the whole trying to add artistic merit issue. But on the other hand, too much of a different feel in a film can alienate a viewer. Unfortunately, Miami Vice isn’t just the latter, but the director takes it so far that it’s like a spit in the face of storytelling.
Miami Vice
1 & 1/2 Stars
I really wanted to like Miami Vice. I was the only person in the realm of film critics that I knew who didn’t think it looked like a stinker. I like Writer/Director Michael Mann, and I like that he took an approach with Miami Vice that few other directors would have the balls to, let alone the creativity. But after both of the films hours (with change), it’ll wash over you how boring and ungripping the movie is.
 |
| The New Don Johnson? |
Miami Vice‘s story is easy enough to understand on paper: Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx are detectives narcing it up in Central America hoping to catch a Drug Lord that killed some co-workers. But on the case Farrell’s character falls for the enemy’s assistant (Gong Li.)
Only it doesn’t come out that easily in the film. The actors linger uneasily in the shots as they spew dialogue without any real verbalization, just dropping the lines. It’s not a sign of bad acting, the characters are just too point-blank to carry any emotion in what few words they say; and because of that it’s difficult to tell what those words falling out of their mouths mean 90% of the time.
Another problem with this innate lack of feeling in the dialogue is the extreme difficulty it presents of relating to any of the characters. I’m no man of publications such as US Weekly or OK!, But I can honestly say I care more about what the tabloids write-up on Farrell and Foxx than these characters. Mann’s script just never decides to take a chunk out of character development, or even character creation.
Instead of delivering a fully-developed script, Mann decides instead to go for a visual flair that easily makes more of an impact on the final product than the any of the actors or the story. But for what it’s worth, it’s damn cool.
Mann used simplistic, hand-held digital cameras that give off more grain than Farrell’s unshaven face in the movie. That, in addition to the shaky camera movement, make the film seem more authentic and believable, like just maybe that isn’t actually Jamie Foxx, it’s a real-life cop doing his real-life job on the real-life streets. I don’t normally like the now-popular technique of shaky camera movement (enough of it on a big screen can upset by stomach,) but it’s used about as well as possible by Mann in Miami Vice.
The only problem is, the cinematography is too cool. It’s like those iPod commercials: watching a black silhouette groove to the beat over a cornucopia of colors is a great way to spend 30 seconds, but if you had to watch it for over two hours it would become daunting. The same goes for Miami Vice, the look is just too much and too different to allow the viewers to appreciate anything else in the film.
There are a couple of intense action sequences, and Mann should be commended for trying to do something different; but in the end Miami Vice is just grade-A style vomitted beyond appreciation over a few reels of film. Too much of a good thing isn’t good.