Uncategorized

Philip Kaufman’s epic tribute to the coolest, baddest mothers to ever hold college degrees

“The Right Stuff” is a huge, ballsy chronicle of the early years of America’s space program, from Chuck Yeager breaking the sound barrier in 1947 to Gordo Cooper’s Mercury flight – the final flight of that maiden program and “the last time America would send a man into space alone.”
Phillip Kaufman manages to corral Tom Wolfe’s book into an epic tribute to the coolest, baddest motherfuckers to ever hold college degrees. That was one of the requisites of those astronaut candidates – a college degree and being under six feet tall, just the right size to squeeze into those ‘cap-sools’ and become – in the words of Chuck Yeager, who was left behind in the program because he didn’t have a college degree – “spam in a can”.
The film was released in 1983 and it sunk The Ladd Company faster than Gus Grissom’s souvenir loaded capsule after he prematurely blew the hatch. At that time, well into Ronald Reagan’s first term, the public – at least the movie going public – wasn’t ready for a three hour film that, on the surface, was awash in unabashed patriotism. At least, that’s the way I saw it. The weekend the film was released, my brother Jimmy and I were at The Chinese Theatre looking at the posters in the courtyard. (The Chinese is owned by The Mann’s Corporation and the posters to all the movies being shown at The Mann’s Theatres in Hollywood were on display.) When we saw the poster for “The Right Stuff” we just looked at each other and shook our heads.
We were poor brown folk and we hated Reagan.
A few days later I went to see the film alone. The theatre was almost empty. But from the opening Appalachian drawl of Levon Helm’s narration to Sam Shepard as Chuck Yeager walking away triumphantly from the burning wreckage of his NF-104, his face plastered with third degree burns and still chompin’ on that Beemin’s , I was hooked. Here was a film like I’d never seen – a perfect blend of post-Watergate, post-Vietnam cynicism and Hero worship. I had grown up on late 60’s and 70’s gritty realism and despair. Frankly, by that time, in my early twenties, I was tired of the messages of films like “The Deer Hunter” and “Apocalypse Now”. I was ready for Heroes and these “star voyagers” were my type of guys. They had all the flaws and insecurities of most men, but they were confident and stoic on the surface. The ‘right stuff’ that Phillip Kaufman and Tom Wolfe (in the book) preached about were the same qualities I had seen in the men I knew while I was growing up, whether they were factory workers, gang members, con artists or good, solid musicians. These men knew how and when to wear their ‘game faces’. They just didn’t walk, they strutted. And, above all, they never ever let you see them sweat or panic.
Sure, the film is flawed. It’s a little too long. Kaufman could’ve pared down the New Mexico lab test toilet humor. And, like most historical and biographical films, he takes liberties with some of the time-line of events. But when it’s on, it’s ON. From the tight ensemble acting to the exhilarating flight sequences, especially the breaking of the sound barrier, where you see that little X-1 rocket drop from the p.o.v. of the belly of that b-29, and John Glenn’s lumbering and massive lift off on that Atlas rocket set to the strains of Gustav Holst’s “Mars, The Bringer of War” from “The Planets”…
Until Clint Eastwood’s “Unforgiven” came along, “The Right Stuff” was the last great western ever made.
As far as the Special Edition 2 disc re-issue, I was disappointed with the aspect ratio, or the ‘widescreen’ format. I was hoping for letterbox, which gives more of the original screen image. But the mini-doc’s and the interviews are good, especially the cast reminiscing about partying at the bar that substituted for Pancho’s Happy Bottom Riding Club, with the snapshots showing Sam Shepard, Dennis Quaid and Fred Ward, among others, drinking hard, just like the flyboys some thirty years earlier.
So if you’ve never seen the film, or “only seen parts of it”, pop it in your player, turn off the lights, get a pillow ready for your girlfriend (because you know she’ll fall asleep halfway through it), and watch “How The Future Began”. Before you know it, you’ll be hunting down a vintage brown leather flight jacket on E-Bay, chompin’ on Beemin’s (if they still make it) and looking for all the original composers to the classical music that Bill Conti ripped off for the score.

20th Century Fox is in the lead for top Studio Market Shares so far this year. I was going to say with movies like, but now that I look back on their release schedule, Mr. and Mrs. Smith is the best they have had in their lineup. Now I’m a little surprised. They do have Cheaper by the Dozen 2, Big Momma’s House 2 and Transporter 2 in their future release schedule; still a little confused how they are on top? Me to. Check the stats for yourself.

N/A

Well, it’s as bad as the original show.

I had quite an adventure on my way to see The Dukes of Hazzard. Not only did major road construction cause me to have to detour way the hell out of the way, but I got lost. Real lost. You see, I like to make it to the screenings fairly early to ensure that I get my seat and so I can get settled before the film begins. Well, my terrible direction sense caused me to finally make it back onto the main highway and to the movie theater with just seconds to spare.
Even though I was stressed out from all the heavy duty driving I had to do and pissed off from getting so incredibly lost, it still ended up being a better time than the actual movie itself.
I just want to make two things clear: I know the original Dukes of Hazzard show was pretty dumb and that this current movie remake isn’t meant to be any great masterpiece of film. Also, after seeing Wedding Crashers and enjoying the hell out of it, I’ve been trying to open my mind a little and give stupid comedies more of a chance.
I tried. Dukes of Hazzard just didn’t cut it.
In redneck Hazzard County in Georgia, Bo and Luke Duke (played by Sean William Scott and Johnny Knoxville, respectively) are just a couple of good ol’ boys runnin’ moonshine deliveries for their uncle Jessie (Willie Nelson). They get harassed by Boss Hogg (Burt Reynolds) and his lackey Sheriff Roscoe P. Coltrane (M.C. Gainey), who hate the Duke boys for all of their wacky shenanigans and also don’t want them to win some lame car race with their famous General Lee.
There’s some stuff with a stupid Nascar driver, played by a guy who is seriously trying to do his best impersonation of Ben Stiller’s character from Dodge Ball, which is pathetic. He ends up being a front for some evil doings that Hogg attempts to orchestrate that will screw over the fine citizens of Hazzard County and our boys must save the day by foiling his plans. It’s like a feature-length version of one of the old episodes, just with more profanity and close-ups of Daisy’s ass.
Oh yeah, Jessica Simpson plays Daisy Duke, the boys’ hot cousin, whose purpose in this movie is solely to lure cops away from their duties with a shake of her ass… like at least four times… the same exact thing throughout the movie… again and again… you get it. It’s not like Catherine Bach’s role in the original series served any other purpose, but Jessica Simpson really has no other reason for being in this movie except to titillate drooling males in the audience and give horny teens a boner.
Look, I like hot chicks. But I guess what rubbed me the wrong way was that the audience actually applauded a close-up of Simpson’s ass. Also, every time she came on the screen the frat boy next to me said either “God” or “Jesus Christ” as if he was about to have to go to the bathroom and check his pants. Anyway, I guess I’m a fool for expecting someone on the big screen to actually have to act for her multi-million dollar reward. Silly me!
Ok, now that I’ve made it over the hurdle of Jessica Simpson’s ass, I can talk a bit about the films shortcomings. Knoxville, Scott, Simpson, and even Burt Reynolds can’t do a southern accent to save their lives and it was distracting. Also, the original Duke boys were supposed to be naive and goofy in a charming way, but Knoxville and Scott are not very convincing. It’s hard to see them as being good ol’ boys that don’t mean to do no harm. Instead, they just end up seeming slightly retarded.
For some reason, they decided to make Roscoe a dour, serious, menacing kind of guy instead of the bumbling, stuttering, idiot that he was in the original show. Now that I think of it, Burt doesn’t really do a bumbling Boss Hogg either and there isn’t much comedy that comes from them. They just show up in scenes looking ridiculous and twirling their mustaches and then their plans get foiled. It’s just kind of static. Sure the original show was corny, but at least it wasn’t boring.
Unfortunately, Willie Nelson is absolutely wasted in this movie (pun intended). Even though he does get out a couple of good lines (and he does have natural charisma… he’s fucking Willie Nelson for chrissakes !), he mainly just appears in scenes rattling off a sting of goofy old jokes for no good reason. Well, I guess the man got a pretty good paycheck for his efforts.
One last thing… I must address a totally stupid and pointless scene in the movie that kind of reveals the fundamental weakness in reviving this old idea for a modern movie. At one point the guys have to drive to Atlanta to get a core sample analyzed (don’t ask). When they get to the big city people start flipping them off and giving them a hard time about being rednecks. Then they stop in a “bad neighborhood” and a group of “gangstas” threaten to kill them for the confederate flag on the top of the General Lee. The boys act very innocent and are confused because Cooter painted the flag on the car without them knowing it.
What is the point of this? Are they trying to make a half-assed apology for the supposed racism that was found in the original show? The Dukes of Hazzard series was made at a time when it was easy to get away with things that today would seem insensitive to certain audiences. The movie, however, makes no improvement on the show and wallows in the same retardation that plagued the series. After watching the new version of The Dukes of Hazzard I’m convinced that it should have remained squarely in the era from which it came.

…

The Dukes of HazzardRead More »

Digital distribution of films could mean better quality in visuals and sound during our film going experience. I ask the question, does it mean lower prices? According to the Motion Picture Association of America this could mean a savings of up to $900 million. I think that should mean a savings for the moviegoer as well. Here is the problem, expensive equipment for theater owners, maybe the studios should consider paying part of the costs, since they are saving so much.

James Cameron is all over this, his CGI/live-action feature Battle Angel is slated to release mid-2007 and is designed with 3-D techniques created specifically for digital projection.

Representatives of Hollywood’s top movie studios say they have agreed on technical specifications that will make it easier to distribute and display movies digitally. Check out the details at Wired.

N/A

Warner Bros. Pictures and Weinstein Co. closed the deal with Imagi Animation Studio to bring back the Turtles. This time they are animated, unlike their 90’s predecessors. The film is currently in pre-production and looks to release in 2007. Details here.

N/A