Movie Reviews

2005: A Year of Consequences

As I thought upon my Top 10 Films of 2005 list, I was struck by the fact that the most prevalent theme in movies this year was about exploring the consequences of our actions.  Sure it’s easy to see that trend in movies like Brokeback Mountain, Munich, or A History of Violence, but even the big popcorn flicks (as well as some surprising little gems) spent some time showing the effects of crossing those moral and ethical lines we’ve set for ourselves.  It’s been a long time since Hollywood had any kind of unifying theme to it’s releases, though I must say I’m glad it looks like studios have realized that you can tell intelligent stories and still entertain.  So let’s take a gander at the best of 2005.

N/A

As I thought upon my Top 10 Films of 2005 list, I was struck by the fact that the most prevalent theme in movies this year was about exploring the consequences of our actions.  Sure it’s easy to see that trend in movies like Brokeback Mountain, Munich, or A History of Violence, but even the big popcorn flicks (as well as some surprising little gems) spent some time showing the effects of crossing those moral and ethical lines we’ve set for ourselves.  It’s been a long time since Hollywood had any kind of unifying theme to it’s releases, though I must say I’m glad it looks like studios have realized that you can tell intelligent stories and still entertain.  So let’s take a gander at the best of 2005.

10) Murderball:
Easily one of the most entertaining documentaries in years, Murderball tells the story of the most badass sports team you’ve never heard of: the American Wheelchair Rugby team.  You read that correctly.  Wheelchair rugby.  And it’s as brutal as the nickname ‘Murderball’ implies.  These guys are seriously tough, and this frank and open look at their lives is a fascinating peek at a world most of us will never know.

09) Broken Flowers:
You’d think anything starring Bill Murray and Jeffrey Wright would be an automatic Top 5 entry, but for all it’s charms Broken Flower is sparse enough to push it towards the bottom of the list.  Don’t be fooled by it’s low placement, however.  It’s a an excellent character piece with some truly amazing performances from it’s leads and the supporting cast.  Murray plays a self-isolated man who may or may not have fathered a son 17years ago.  Convinced by his wanna-be detective neighbor (Wright), Murray’s aging Lothario embarks on a journey that finds him catching up with his old flames and finding out that he’s the only one who hasn’t really moved forward.  It’s cinematic minimalism at it’s best, and it’s a great study of a man who knows he can’t fill a void he’s created.

08. Batman Begins:
Consider this my obligatory fan-boy entry, but make no mistake: Batman Begins has a lot going for it.  Christopher Nolan took the Bat franchise back to it’s roots, but with enough twist to keep it fresh and engaging. Christian Bale absolutely owns the character of Bruce Wayne (though I’ll admit he’s given short shift once the suit shows up), and overall it’s an entertaining comic book romp with more smarts than I expected.  The biggest (and best) chunk of the film focuses solely on Wayne and the inner demons that drive him to weat a funny hat and a cape, and never has the man behind the mask been more interesting.  An uneven last act kills any top 5 chances this film had (I’d have been estastic had the fabled bat suit not shown up until the last 10 minutes), but still one of the better popcorn films this summer and waaaaay more enjoyable than Lucas’s sad wrap up of the Star Wars series.

07. Oldboy
Technically this Korean film was released in 2003, but it just hit American theaters this past Spring.  Oldboy (The second entry in Chan-wook Park’s Vengeance trilogy) is a movie that redefines what can be considered a WTF? plot twist.  You’d think a film that tells the story of a man kidnapped off the street and confined to an apartment for 15 years only to be unceremoniously released by his anonymous captors might not have many surprises left, but damn would you be wrong.  A serious powerhouse performance by Min-sik Choi as a man with nothing left to live for except revenge is icing on a very violent cake.  In addition to the most eff’d up ending of all time, Oldboy boasts one of the best (and most realistic) brawl scenes you’ll ever see.  It’s out on DVD now so go rent this movie, but be prepared to take a very long shower afterwards.

06. Transamerica
This little film tells the story of a pre-op man-to-woman transexual who’s travelling across the country in the company of his/her newly discovered son.  It sounds like a gimmick movie just begging for an Oscar, but Felicity Huffman’s absolutely incredible lead performance elevates this not-so-simple road movie into truly powerful cinema.  Were that performance taken away, I’m not sure the remainder would warrant inclusion on any best of lists, but the barely recognizable Huffman really takes this film to the next level.

05. History of Violence
David Cronenberg stepped out of the fringe genres he’s helped create to take a just-shy-of-mainstream stab at this tale of a man forced into violence and the effect it has on his family.  Viggo Morgensten was a great choice to play the man who may or may not be the small town family man he appears to be, and Maria Bello (who was my second choice for Best Actress. Screw you Golden Globes and your best supporting nod) does an amazing turn as a wife coming to realize she doesn’t really know this man she’s made a life with.  Cronengberg plays both sides of the fence in this one by showing us just how damaging a single act of violence can be, while simultaneously reveling in that violence’s horrific effect on the human body.  History of Violence is a great reminder that a good deal of our favorite genre filmmakers are excellent directors in their own right, no matter what their subject matter may be.

04. Good Night & Good Luck
George Clooney’s second directorial debut echoes the outspoken star’s take on media and politics by tackling Edward R. Murrow’s very public fight against Sen. Joseph McCartney and his HUAC cronies.  Leaving aside the story for a second, I want to emphasize how beautifully made this film was.  Lush black and white photography, a set that perfectly recreated the CBS news room offices, and note-perfect mix of archival and recreated footage really showcase Clooney’s eye for quality cinema.  He was very seriously on my short list for Best Director this year, and it took guys like Ang Lee and Spielberg to knock him out of the running.  But let’s not overlook David Straithairn’s fantastic turn as Murrow.  His laconic voice and delivery were just perfect, as was the rest of this fantastic ensemble cast. Ray Wise, Frank Langella, Robert Downey Jr, and Patricia Clarkson, and Clooney himself round out this well executed powerhouse of a drama, and while it may take place in the early 50’s, it’s a message that’s all too relevant today.

03. Syriana
This sprawling look at Amercan interests in the Middle East comes from Stephen Gaghan, who penned the screenplay for the similarly sprawling (if more flawed) Traffic.  Based off of former CIA agent Robert Baer’s accounts in “See No Evil”, Syriana examines our actions in the oil industry from multiple levels, from the Washington power brokers who make the deals to the behind the scenes players who make them happen, to the anonymous workers of the oil fields themselves.  It’s a film that refuses to dumb down or compromise, instead asking the viewer to pay close attention to every little detail in order to fully understand what’s being portrayed.  If any film demanded you already have a small understanding of how our government truly works, it’s Syriana, but even those unaware can get sucked in.  This is the second Clooney flavored entry on this list, and it’s similarly an excellent ensemble cast with Clooney, Jeffrey Wright, Christopher Plummer, Matt Damon, Andrew Siddig, and Chris Cooper topping off it’s impressive credits.  It’s less clear a message than Good Night & Good Luck, but it’s similarly a message film that works without resorting to Michael Moore-ish tactics.

02. Brokeback Mountain
I’m personally sick of a the jokes this film is generating, if for no other reason that they usually reflect the maker’s unfamiliarity with the film itself.  Ang Lee (working from a Larry McMurtry script) turns in the year’s most gorgeously shot film, along with some incredible performances from Heath Ledger, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Michelle Williams.  While it’s true that this is a film about two men who desperately want to be together at it’s heart it’s a story about desire and circumstance, and what happens when we repress our most powerful emotions.  As a love story it’s universal.  Thematically it’s most similar to Wong Kar Wei’s excellent ‘In the Mood for Love’, as both are stories of people trapped by social convention and circustances which keep them from pursuing what they truly want.

01. Munich
Spielberg isn’t known for fast turnaround, and the idea that he got this movie shot, cut, and released in about half a year is just jawdropping.  Perhaps the rushed production schedule helped shave off those prologues/epilogues that often contain Spielberg’s worst missteps, but regardless of how it came to be, Munich is very simply (and quite easily) the best film of the year.  Another period piece with powerful echos of current events, this telling of the aftermath of the 1970 abduction and killing of 11 Israeli atheletes explores the concept of vengeance from the perspective of the mean tasked with carrying it out.  Eric Bana (in a performance I personally think is the best of the year) heads up yet another stellar cast as the leader of a deep-cover group of Mossad agents whose only goal is to kill every one responsible for the Munich attack.  Eager to prove himself worthy of his hero father’s name, Bana jumps willingly into the moral abyss of political vengeance, and it’s through his experiences that we can understand the human cost of retribution.  The performance alone is worth the ticket price, but along the way Speilberg treats us to the most visually gritty film he’s ever made, which is stragely beautiful in a way only he can deliver.  What’s so amazing about this film is that it refuses to take sides, smartly claiming that violence will only perpetuate itself, no matter how righteous the cause.  For this Speilberg has taken no small amount of heat from just about everybody, but dammit he’s right, and someone needs to say so. 

I for one think this was a damn fine year for movies (even though the Spring was pretty dreadful), and with any luck the box office reciepts will put a fire under Hollywood’s pampered and self-entitled ass to recognize that films don’t have to be about explosions and fart jokes.  Your dollars going to those movies which rightfully deserve them will go a long way to driving that message home.  We live in an uncertain and turmultuous world, and sometimes we need films to remind us of the larger picture.  I’m pretty pleased with this year’s films all around, as coming up with this list wasn’t easy for all the choices out there.  For completion’s sake, here’s my Honorable Mentions: War of the Worlds, The Devil’s Rejects, Capote, Inside Deep Throat, and Hustle and Flow.

2005: A Year of Consequences Read More »

Match Point

Match Point is the latest film by Woody Allen and it has some very fine performances if few surprises.  The film takes place in England (rather than New York) the film doesn’t star Woody Allen (or an impersonation of Woody Allen) and the plot is rather low-key.  An enjoyable little film that is quite different from Allen’s later style.  I just wish it wasn’t so predictable.

Match Point
3 & 1/2 Stars

Match Point is an interesting character study of a somewhat unscrupulous man trying to get everything he wants, without having to do too any real work.  It’s just a little too predictable for my tastes, but it is very well done.  Everything that happens in the first ten minutes foreshadows all that will happen the final hour and forty-five.  Even small moments in the plot are given away well before the scene ends (or in some cases, even begin).

Chris (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers) is a former tennis player turned tennis pro at an exclusive club.  There he meets Tom (Matthew Goode) and strikes up a friendship with Tom and his family.  He starts dating Tom’s sister Chloe (Emily Mortimer) and becomes a favorite of his father (Brian Cox) and mother (Penelope Wilton).

The problem is Chris falls madly in love with American actress Nola Rice (Scarlett Johansson) who Tom is dating.  From their first moments on screen together you know the whole affair is going to end bloody.

The film is well cast and the performances from all are first rate.  Brian Cox provides a nice supporting role as the loving and doting father and Mortimer works well as the loving, but needy, Chloe.  The films best role goes to Rhys-Meyers as the complicated and scheming Chris who wants the security and wealth of his marriage but can’t ignore his lust for Nola.Johansson gives us a complex woman, who knows her effect on men and uses it to her advantage.  Though I did find her performance too whiney in the last act.  Both flawed main characters are very human in their need for passionate love and their inability for emotional commitment and responsibility.

It’s nice to see Woody Allen moving away from the same types of movies he has made in recent years (The Curse of the Jade Scorpion, Anything Else, Small Time Crooks, Celebrity)  and make something different; though fans of Crimes and Misdemeanors may find it a little too similar.

This is a hard movie for me to review because of how well it is made must be balanced at how predictable and telegraphed the film is.  I sat down to watch the film a second time to make up my mind.  What I’m left with is this:  Match Point is a lovingly made film by a great director and, although quite flawed, is still worth a first and even second look.

Is it Woody Allen’s best work?  No, but it is better than his recent entries and shows he still has stories left to tell.  He finally seems to be back on the right track.  Not a must-see by any means, but a good film by an American icon that I think you will be able to enjoy despite its flaws.

Match Point Read More »

Bareback Mountain

  • Title: Brokeback Mountain
  • IMDB: link

brokeback-mountain-poster

Brokeback Mountain seems to be this year’s belle of the ball garnering seven Golden Globe nominations.  Is it the best film of the year?  No, but it’s pretty darn good.  Garnering huge attention for it’s detailed look at the secret homosexual relationship between two cowboys Ang Lee gives us an intriguing tale that just like Heath Ledger’s character desperately wants to say more than it is knows how to.

The story involves the secret relationship of Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) and Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) which begins one summer as the two cowboys herd sheep up on Brokeback Mountain.  A physical relationship develops between the two that picks up years later as both men have moved on with their lives, settled down and married.  On fishing trips back to Brokeback the two bask in the joy of being together knowing that the outside world will never accept them and they can only truly be together on the mountain.

Bareback Mountain Read More »

A History of Violence

  • Title: A History of Violence
  • IMDb: link

a-history-of-violence

A History of Violence is only 96 minutes long and everything you need to know about the film can be found in that amount of time.  It’s a streamlined and stripped down story that doesn’t waste a single frame or a single performance.  And for its short running time it is amazingly effective, disturbing, distressing, and haunting.

Tom Stall (Viggo Mortensen) and his wife Edie (Mario Bello) own a diner in a sleepy little town of Millbrook, Indiana.  They are raising a son (Ashton Holmes) who is tortured by bullies but has been taught to turn the other cheek, and a young daughter (Heidi Hayes).  Their life seems idyllic until a pair of thugs attempt to rob the diner and kill the witnesses.  Tom kills both men with brutal efficiency that is unusual in a diner owner of a sleepy town.

A History of Violence Read More »

Poorly Produced

Ugh…The Producers is a staged remake of the Broadway show which was remade from the original movie starring Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel.  So it’s a remake of a remake (of a sort) and it feels like it.  Is it bad when the Springtime for Hitler number is the most professionally done (and still nowhere near as good as the original) of, well anything, in the film?

The Producers (2005)
1 Star

I never went to see the play The Producers, until now.  I say that because the film looks like so much like a stage show that I wondered why they didn’t just tape a Broadway performance on Betamax and distort the image through a projector onto the screen.  I guess that would have aimed too high.

I am a huge fan of the original film which I consider to be Mel Brooks’ funniest film (though not best, here’s that review).  I could have lived without seeing the never-ending disaster that Susan Sroman, Matthew Broderick, Nathan Lane, and Uma Thurman create out of such a great script.

The story more closely follows the stage version rather than the original movie which involves producer Max Bialystock (Nathan Lane) and accountant Leo Bloom (Matthew Broderick) deciding to produce the biggest flop on Broadway, sell off more than the play is worth to backers, and pocket the cash when the play closes opening night.  A great plan, but this is a comedy so what happens?  The worst musical in the world Springtime for Hitler becomes an instant smash success and the talk of Broadway!

I would have preferred to watch a two hour version of Springtime for Hitler or Police Academy 6: City Under Siege or even receive a caning.  Everything goes wrong here except life doesn’t imitate art and this flop sadly never becomes a hit.  Mel Brooks wrote the roles of Leo and Max specifically for Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel.  Broderick and Lane just can’t fill their shoes.  Even in the best moments of this movie (all three of them) the feeling of “yeah, but that’s still not as good” comes to mind.

Broderick doesn’t have Wilder’s innocence and fragility.  The actor that as a kid pulled off the super confident Ferris Beuller just doesn’t fit the insecure Leo Bloom.  Lane is a little better, though he too is doing more of an impression than his own character.  The whole movie feels like a Saturday Night Live skit based on the original movie rather than a movie of its own.

The story has evolved, changed, and lengthened as Mel Brooks turned it into a play.  Part of the problem was giving the helm to stage director Susan Stroman who never makes the necessary changes to take the Broadway musical and turn it back into a film.  The timing and action of the piece, the sets and musical numbers, all seem out of place on film.

I’ll give you an example of how the new model fails to live up to the original:

After waiting roughly 105 minutes for the curtain to finally rise on Springtime for Hitler (the original is a total of 88 minutes, versus this 134 minute version) what we get is truly disappointing.  In the original the full musical number is performed including cannons, singing Nazis, a choreographed swastika dance, flags and banners.  As the number ends the camera pans to a stunned audience except for one man who is beaten down for his jubliant applause.  The audience starts to leave and is only stopped by LSD’s (Dick Shawn) performance (a character NOT included in this version).  FUNNY!

Lane and Broderick try to hide from
anyone who has seen this film

So what does this version do?  It pans to the audience several times during the opening number showing shock before anything really shocking occurs on stage and the audience actually accepts and applauds before and during the swastika number accepting and appreciating it.  Confusing and UNFUNNY!! 

Also missing is the bar scene where Leo and Bloom’s celebration is cut short by the terror of intermission as they hear the audience praising the play, and the ending that includes the plot to blow up the theater.

The film is full of such changes.  The removal of LSD as a character broadens the one-joke characters of writer Franz Leibkind (Will Farrell) and Roger de Bris (Gary Beach).  Problems start to occur immediately however as the actors are asked to do too much with such limited roles.  The film also makes de Bris and his band into crude, stereotypical, and tasteless gay caricatures.  How bad is it?  The Village People appear (no, that’s not a joke, though I guess Brooks thought it would be).  Farrell is fine as Leibkind but has to improv too much as his character, like all the rest, is on screen too long.

Uma Thurman plays Ulla the Swedish secretary.  She actually is pretty good in the role (though was her make-up person blind? or maybe cross-eyed?).  Her accent comes and goes (especially during the signing numbers) but she comes off better than most of the cast.  Yet here again a one-joke character from the original “Bialystock and Blum, got dag pa dig” is stretched thin in an unecessary lengthy role.

Don’t pay a dime for this; save your money and go out and get the DVD of the original 1968 version of The Producers.  This version is just a waste of a theater that could be showing something better (like Narnia or Kong or a three hour documentary on yeast infections).  Hopefully people will stop trying to remake Wilder’s films now, but I have this horrible fear that I’ll see a new Silver Streak with Owen Wilson and Chris Tucker announced any day now.  Stop trying to ruin the films I love and just get back to making more Hollywood crap that people so enjoy…hey I hear Fantastic Four 2 is on its way.

Poorly Produced Read More »